MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339546818 · doi:10.14288/1.0050464

Seismic behavior and design of friction concentrically braced frames for steel buildings

2009· article· en· W2339546818 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringSeismic analysisBraced frameEngineeringSteel frameGeologyForensic engineeringGeotechnical engineeringFrame (networking)Mechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores the possibility of improving the seismic response of concentrically braced frames (CBFs) by including friction connections at the end of the bracing members. These connections will slip at a predetermined load level in order to absorb and dissipate by friction most of the energy input by earthquake ground motions, and then avoid yielding and buckling of the bracing members. The characteristics of CBFs and other alternative systems are reviewed and a FCBF system is proposed which includes bolted brace connections with slotted holes in the gusset plates. 42 connection samples including various faying surface materials and bolting configurations were subjected to dynamically applied cyclic loading. These tests revealed that a stable response can be achieved by using proper sliding material together with an appropriate bolt clamping force level. The behavior of a full-scale braced frame assembly undergoing severe interstorey drifts was also investigated. The results of the quasi-static tests performed showed that the system behaves in a very predictable and satisfactory manner. An analytical study including nonlinear dynamic analyses of typical single- and multi-storey FCBFs was then performed in order to develop design guidelines for their stability under seismic loading. For single-storey buildings with a rigid roof diaphragm, design spectra were developed for predicting the ductility demand and the threshold of instability. For single-storey structures with a flexible roof diaphragm, a case study including 48 buildings revealed that this type of structure experiences more significant nonlinear response than the equivalent SDOF system. Analyses of eight braced frames varying from 2 to 12 storeys in height showed that instability in multi-storey FCBFs occurs in a collapse mechanism involving only a few stories. Such phenomena can be inhibited by providing the columns in the building with sufficient bending strength and stiffness. Values were proposed for the stiffness which appeared to yield a stable response of the frames. Columns designed solely for gravity loads were found to have sufficient strength for sustaining the moments likely to develop during ground motions. Design criteria for the brace induced column loads and for the loads acting in the collecting elements were also proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it