De la revendication locale à la mise en cause globale : trajectoire du mouvement d’opposition au gaz de schiste au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La controverse sur le gaz de schiste au Québec intègre de multiples enjeux et, en s’inspirant de la sociologie de la traduction, il est possible d’illustrer les processus de construction sociale et politique ayant participé à sa mise à l’ordre du jour et à son cadrage politique. L’analyse de la trajectoire des acteurs et de leur argumentation montre un certain succès du réseau d’intéressement autour de l’opposition au gaz de schiste tandis que la généralisation de la lutte à l’ensemble des hydrocarbures de roche-mère est endiguée par les réseaux de l’industrie et du gouvernement. Cette étude apporte un éclairage supplémentaire à l’analyse des controverses en soulignant le rôle central des opérations de cadrage de ce qui est construit comme un problème public.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".