MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339712188 · doi:10.14288/1.0107743

Design of the Eldorado Gold Efemçukuru filtered tailings facility

2011· article· en· W2339712188 on OpenAlexaff
Karvin Kwan, Richard Dawson, Calvin Boese, Dale Churcher

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsEnvironmental scienceMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eldorado’s Efemçukuru Project incorporates the design of a filtered tailings facility to store 1 million cubic metres of dry stack filtered tailings in a high seismicity region of Western Turkey. Compared to conventional tailings technologies, dry stack filtered tailings have many advantages in terms of lowering long-term environmental liability/impacts (for example through decreased potential seepage, minimized storage footprints, and ease of progressive reclamation). An important design feature of this project is the incorporation of a fullylined base (HDPE/GCL double-liner) coupled with an underdrain system for seepage control at the base of the facility, as the tailings are potentially acid-generating. Increased structural integrity is achieved through compaction of tailings filter cake material in lifts, the construction of rock toe berms on the downstream side of the pile, and selection of a double-liner system that will provide sufficient frictional strength in this high seismic zone. The use of a filtered tailings and liner system in the Eldorado Gold Efemçukuru project provides added protection of groundwater resources and represents another step in tailings waste management and environmental stewardship in the industry.[All papers were considered for technical and language appropriateness by the organizing committee.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.144
Teacher spread0.123 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicTailings Management and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207