Studies of the effect of soil biota on metal bioavailability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La biodisponibilite de metal est un meilleur indicateur des risques a la sante associes avec l'usage de sol que l'analyse totale habituelle. Alors que le mecanisme de prelevement de metaux par les plantes n'est pas bien compris, le role d'autres biota du sol, tels que les vers de terre, a recu peu d'attention. En consequence, deux etudes preliminaires furent entreprises pour examiner les effets de biota de sol sur le biodisponibilite de metaux. Dans la premiere, nous avons utilise des balayages par fluorescence des rayons-X a l'echelle du micron pour examiner les distributions de metal a l'interieur des racines et rhizospheres de peupliers. Dans la seconde, les effets de la digestion des vers de terres sur la coordination de metal furent examines par spectroscopie de structure pres du front d'absorption de rayons-X (XANES).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".