Processo de aprendizagem e inclusao digital na terceira idade
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente estudo buscou conhecer as condições que facilitam e dificultam o aprendizado do uso do computador observado por alunos de um grupo de terceira idade que fizeram parte de um projeto de inclusão digital. Tratou-se de um estudo quantitativo, longitudinal e descritivo, com a aplicação de um questionário estruturado com perguntas fechadas aos 19 alunos de faixa etária igual ou superior a 50 anos sobre as dificuldades e facilidades do uso do computador. As principais condições facilitadoras apontadas pelos participantes referiram-se às atitudes do professor no processo de aprendizagem, o bom relacionamento entre os alunos e o professor e as novas amizades que surgiram durante o curso consideradas motivadoras do aprendizado. A dificuldade de memória constituiu-se na condição dificultadora mais apontada pelos alunos. Concluiu-se, que a atividade com o computador pode se tornar prazerosa e estimuladora através das novas amizades, do bom relacionamento entre os alunos e o professor proporcionando o processo de aprendizagem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".