MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339890514 · doi:10.14288/1.0067637

New ventilation design criteria for underground metal mines based upon the "life-cycle" airflow demand schedule

2009· article· en· W2339890514 on OpenAlexaffabout
Karoly-Charles P. Kocsis

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSafety and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAirflowVentilation (architecture)Environmental scienceScheduleEngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presently, mine ventilation systems are designed more towards the “worst-case-scenario” with respect to airflow demand, which usually occurs well in the future of a mine’s operating life. Consequently, within the early stages of operation, the mines’ intake air volume could be well in excess of their “true” ventilation needs. Such ventilation systems are inefficient and this design approach needs to change if Canadian mines are to remain competitive while attempting to reduce their carbon footprints. This thesis introduces a new method that can be used to evaluate the efficiency of large and complex underground ventilation systems. This new evaluation method is based upon the magnitude of a mine’s potential “ventilation redundancy” that can be used to gauge the efficiency of its ventilation system. Two conventionally analyzed case studies presented in this thesis highlight the complexity and difficulty in determining the ventilation redundancy in large and deep metal mines. Challenges include gaining adequate data to assess the dynamic nature of the production activities that continually redefine where ventilation is required. To address this issue, this thesis introduces a novel method, where a multi-level mining block’s activity based intake air volume is determined through discrete-event mining process simulation using AutoModTM. In accordance with the number of active mining blocks that will be required to achieve future production requirements, the mine’s “traditional” and “activity based” life-cycle airflow demand schedule is subsequently determined. Furthermore, based upon the life-cycle airflow demand schedule the mine’s primary and auxiliary ventilation systems are solved through ventilation simulation. The output data generated through ventilation simulation was then used to determine the economic and environmental benefits of an “activity based” ventilation system versus a “traditional” ventilation system. This new ventilation design concept, which is based upon the mine’s life-cycle airflow demand schedule determined through discrete-event process simulation can fundamentally change the way underground ventilation systems are presently designed and operated. This can be extremely important for the reason that besides providing adequate airflow to the production workings, this new design approach would assist the mines to reduce their energy consumption and consequently their GHG emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicSafety and Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207