MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340036327 · doi:10.1109/tap.2016.2588495

Arbitrary Power-Conserving Field Transformations With Passive Lossless Omega-Type Bianisotropic Metasurfaces

2016· article· en· W2340036327 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLossless compressionStack (abstract data type)WavefrontCoupling (piping)Electrical impedanceScatteringPhase (matter)Near and far fieldField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a general theory for designing realistic omega-type bianisotropic metasurfaces (O-BMSs), unlocking their full potential for molding electromagnetic fields. These metasurfaces, characterized by electric surface impedance, magnetic surface admittance, and magnetoelectric coupling coefficient, were previously considered for wavefront manipulation. However, previous reports mainly considered plane-wave excitations, and implementations included cumbersome metallic features. In this paper, we prove that any field transformation that locally conserves real power can be implemented via passive and lossless meta-atoms characterized by closed-form expressions; this allows rigorous incorporation of arbitrary source and scattering configurations. Subsequently, we show that O-BMS meta-atoms can be implemented using an asymmetric stack of three impedance sheets, an appealing structure for printed circuit board fabrication. Our formulation reveals that, as opposed to Huygens' metasurfaces, which exhibit negligible magnetoelectric coupling, O-BMSs are not limited to controlling the phase of transmitted fields, but can rather achieve a high level of control over the amplitude and phase of reflected fields. This is demonstrated by designing O-BMSs for reflectionless wide-angle refraction, independent surface-wave guiding, and a highly directive low-profile antenna, verified with full-wave simulations. This straightforward methodology facilitates the development of O-BMS-based devices for controlling the near and far fields of arbitrary sources in complex scattering configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it