MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340125692 · doi:10.82308/6334

The tip of the iceberg: the "making" of fetal alcohol syndrome in Canada

2003· article· en· W2340125692 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcebergMedicineObstetricsGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La production de connaissances et les pratiques associées au Canada a la catégorie diagnostique de « syndrome d'alcoolisme fœtal » (SAF) ont identifié les populations aborigènes comme étant les groupes les plus à risque de troubles congénitaux provoques par une exposition prénatale a l'alcool. Malgré des preuves scientifiques et cliniques limitées, les femmes Aborigènes semblent davantage abuser de l'alcool durant leur grossesse et ce, comparativement aux femmes non aborigènes, et les problèmes deComportements que l'on retrouve chez les Aborigènes, plus particulièrement chez les enfants et les adolescents, sont de plus en plus attribues aux handicaps primaires et secondaires associes à une exposition prénatale a l'alcool ainsi qu’au diagnostic de SAF. Cette catégorie diagnostique existe à l'intérieur d'un contexte médical ou les outils et mesures normalises cohérents permettant de diagnostiquer les troubles causés par l'exposition prénatale a l'alcool n'existent pas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it