The tip of the iceberg: the "making" of fetal alcohol syndrome in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La production de connaissances et les pratiques associées au Canada a la catégorie diagnostique de « syndrome d'alcoolisme fœtal » (SAF) ont identifié les populations aborigènes comme étant les groupes les plus à risque de troubles congénitaux provoques par une exposition prénatale a l'alcool. Malgré des preuves scientifiques et cliniques limitées, les femmes Aborigènes semblent davantage abuser de l'alcool durant leur grossesse et ce, comparativement aux femmes non aborigènes, et les problèmes deComportements que l'on retrouve chez les Aborigènes, plus particulièrement chez les enfants et les adolescents, sont de plus en plus attribues aux handicaps primaires et secondaires associes à une exposition prénatale a l'alcool ainsi qu’au diagnostic de SAF. Cette catégorie diagnostique existe à l'intérieur d'un contexte médical ou les outils et mesures normalises cohérents permettant de diagnostiquer les troubles causés par l'exposition prénatale a l'alcool n'existent pas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".