MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340173526 · doi:10.1039/9781782623816-00336

Optical Hyperpolarization of Noble Gases for Medical Imaging

2016· book-chapter· en· W2340173526 on OpenAlexaff
T. Pałasz, Bogusław Tomanek

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoble gasHyperpolarization (physics)Optical pumpingPolarization (electrochemistry)MetastabilityXenonSpectroscopyMaterials scienceNuclear magnetic resonanceChemistryOpticsNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyAtomic physicsPhysicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of human or animal lungs became possible with the application of hyperpolarized noble gases, such as 3He or 129Xe. This method allows obtaining information on lung morphology and functionality. Introduction of hyperpolarized noble gases provided as well a new tool for non-medical applications such as neutron filters or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy studies in porous materials. The high polarization of noble gases is possible using so-called optical pumping methods. In this chapter the two most common polarization techniques of noble gases (3He and 129Xe), spin exchange optical pumping (SEOP) and metastability exchange optical pumping (MEOP) are presented. Variations of these methods delivering higher 3He and 129Xe polarization including hybrid SEOP or MEOP in standard conditions and in elevated pressure and high magnetic fields are also reported. A short description of the equipment used for gas polarization is also provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207