Bibliographic record
Abstract
The business models of software/platform as a service have contributed to developers dependence on the Internet. Developers can rapidly point each other and consumers to the newest software changes with the power of the hyper link. But, developers are not limited to referencing software changes to one another through the web. Other shared hypermedia might include links to: Stack Overflow, Twitter, and issue trackers. This work explores the software traceability of Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) which software developers leave in commit messages and software repositories. URLs are easily extracted from commit messages and source code. Therefore, it would be useful to researchers if URLs provide additional insight on project development. To assess traceability, manual topic labelling is evaluated against automated topic labelling on URL data sets. This work also shows differences between URL data collected from commit messages versus URL data collected from source code. As well, this work explores outlying software projects with many URLs in case these projects do not provide meaningful software relationship information. Results from manual topic labelling show promise under evaluation while automated topic labelling did not yield precise topics. Further investigation of manual and automated topic analysis would be useful.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.019 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".