Elevated levels of circulating <scp>CD</scp>4<sup>+</sup><scp>CRT</scp>h2<sup>+</sup> T cells characterize severe asthma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTh2) is a receptor for PGD2 and expressed by T cells, eosinophils, basophils, and ILC2 cells. CRTh2 expression by CD4(+) T cells identifies the Th2 subset, and these cells have been characterized as allergen-specific central memory Th2 cells. Recently, activation of the PGD2 -CRTh2 pathway in the lungs was associated with severe asthma. OBJECTIVE: To assess circulating levels of Th2 cells and related mediators in severe asthma and those who experience asthma exacerbations. METHODS: Peripheral blood cells expressing CRTh2 were characterized by flow cytometry and qRT-PCR. Serum IL-13 and PGD2 were measured by ELISA and compared with asthma severity and tendency to exacerbate. RESULTS: Severe asthmatics had more circulating CD4(+) CRTh2(+) T cells, CRTh2 and GATA3 mRNA, and a higher level of serum IL-13 compared to mild/moderate asthmatics. The proportion of CD4(+) CRTh2(+) T cells was associated with lower lung function and was highest in severe asthmatics that exacerbated in the last year. Circulating CD4(+) CRTh2(+) T cells, unlike eosinophils, were positively correlated with inhaled steroid dose. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Elevated levels of circulating CD4(+) CRTh2(+) T cells are a feature of severe asthma, despite high-dose corticosteroids. Tracking the systemic level of these cells may help identify type 2 severe asthmatics at risk of exacerbation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".