MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340387557 · doi:10.1353/wfs.2008.0040

Eating Well, Reading Well: Maryse Condé and the Ethics of Interpretation by Nicole Simek (review)

2008· article· en· W2340387557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah E. Mosher

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen in French studies · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCaribbean and African Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretation (philosophy)IntertextualityReading (process)AmbivalencePoliticsSubjectivityFrenchHistoryLiteratureArt historyArtSociologyHumanitiesPhilosophyPsychoanalysisPolitical scienceLawPsychologyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1 54Women in French Studies undergraduates as well. Mothers ofInvention is a groundbreaking work and will provide new paths for future scholars ofFrench and Québécois feminist writers. Juliette M. RogersUniversity of New Hampshire Simek, Nicole. Eating Well, Reading Well: Maryse Condé and the Ethics of Interpretation. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2008. Pp 235. ISBN: 978-90-420-23277 . Paperback. €47. Eating Well, Reading Well: Maryse Condé and the Ethics ofInterpretation by Nicole Simek proposes a critical, ethical approach to the creative writings of Maryse Condé while simultaneously refusing the paradigm of literature as moral code. Specifically, the book examines the way in which the global reader responds to and consumes each text while keeping in mind the problematic of exemplarity. One ofthe greatest strengths ofthe book is the variety and diversity of the subjects addressed within each chapter. Focusing on four main themes including history and globalization, intertextuality and reader reception, trauma and subjectivity, as well as community and ethics, this beautifully executed and meticulous study provides a detailed analysis of eight of Condé's well-known literary works spanning three decades. Maryse Condé is unique in that she writes from the perspective of the privileged bourgeoisie while other Francophone Caribbean writers tend to represent the socio-political plight of the lower classes. Condé is also exceptional for her refusal to subscribe to the literary movements Négritude, Créolité, Antillanité that have largely defined twentieth-century Francophone Caribbean literature. Furthermore, Condé is known for denouncing the notion that literary works possess the power to change the world. Her literary characters thus, do not typically represent models or archetypes of social excellence. The trademark of Condé's texts is their ability to weave intricate mosaics of language and cultural references that reach across geographic boundaries. Condé's numerous literary works thus create an artistic space that privileges the intersection of race, class, gender, and the unique position of Guadeloupean literature within a postcolonial context. Given the island's complex relationship to the Hexagon in the postcolonial era, Condé speaks ofthe artificiality ofGuadeloupe since the island's original inhabitants were exterminated centuries ago. Simek's informed investigation of both the production and reception of Condé's works is enhanced by the book's unique pairing of the author's creative works. The chapters are organized in such a way as to provide a platform for unprecedented comparison and scrutiny of the trajectory of Condé's rich literary career. In the introduction, Simek seamlessly outlines the role of exemplarity, literary texts, and the role of the reader/consumer ofthose texts as well as the way in which Condé has artistically and theoretically participated in such dialogues during the span of her career. Simek successfully demonstrates how, through her Book Reviews155 writing, Condé engages and agitates the reader and the reading process, thus prolonging and enhancing the consumption ofthe postcolonial text. Maryse Condé is known for her rich intertextuality as well as her re-staging of works that belong to the traditional European canon. Simek very successfully shows how this practice represents a way for the author to employ parody and irony to ruse with her readers. It is equally through her re-writing of well-known texts such as Emily Bronte's Wuthering Heights and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, that Condé destabilizes, consumes, and re-invents Western canonical texts. The arguments of this study are convincing, ground breaking, and extremely well-crafted. This book will no doubt serve as a springboard for further investigation and critical analysis of Maryse Condé's writings. Best suited for graduate work or scholarly research, this book makes a fundamental contribution to Condé studies and the field of Francophone Caribbean literature. Sarah E. MosherUniversity of North Dakota Staël, Madame de. Oeuvres critiques, tome 1 : Lettres sur Rousseau ; De l'influence des passions et autres essais moraux. Oeuvres complètes, série I. Ed. Florence Lotterie. Paris : Honoré Champion, 2008. Pp 423. ISBN 978-27453 -1642-4. €77 (Hardcover). In his general preface, Michel Delon sketches the publication history of Staël's Oeuvres complètes, beginning with its first appearance following her death, as a written monument to the combined works of Jacques Necker and Germaine...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen in French studiesSame topicCaribbean and African Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207