La santé psychosociale des élèves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Afin de promouvoir la sante psychosociale des eleves, il convient de mettre en evidence les facteurs de risques inherents a cette periode de vie, mais aussi, et surtout, les facteurs de protection qui peuvent etre pris en charge par l’ecole, notamment dans le contexte de l’etablissement solaire et de la classe. Apres s’etre interesse a la sante des enseignants dans La sante psychosociale des enseignants et des enseignantes, les directeurs de ce collectif se concentrent maintenant sur celle des eleves. Avec des contributions de chercheurs issus des sciences de l’education, de la psychologie, de la neuropsychologie, de la medecine, de la psychiatrie et de la pedopsychiatrie, cet ouvrage repose sur une approche multidisciplinaire de la sante psychosociale des eleves, que l’on parle de stress, de violence, de maltraitance ou de detresse psychologique. Il se veut un point de convergence de specialistes quebecois, suisses, francais, belges et finlandais qui privilegient une approche positive et preventive de la sante a l’ecole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".