MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340468761 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.92.064314

Lifetime measurements of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>excited states and three-body and continuum effects

2015· article· lv· W2340468761 on OpenAlexafffund
D. Smalley, H. Iwasaki, P. Navrátil, Robert Roth, Joachim Langhammer, V. M. Bader, D. Bazin, J. S. Berryman, C. M. Campbell, Jérémy Dohet-Eraly, P. Fallon, A. Gade, C. Langer, A. Lemasson, C. Loelius, A. O. Macchiavelli, C. Morse, J. J. Parker, Sofia Quaglioni, F. Recchia, S. R. Stroberg, D. Weißhaar, K. Whitmore, K. Wimmer

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2015
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryOak Ridge National LaboratoryNational Research Council CanadaNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Nuclear Security AdministrationOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of EnergyTechnische Universität DarmstadtLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungChina Scholarship CouncilHelmholtz International Center for FAIRDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftTRIUMFNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsExcited stateAtomic physicsParticle physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We studied transition rates for the lowest $1/{2}^{+}$ and $5/{2}^{+}$ excited states of $^{17}\mathrm{C}$ through lifetime measurements with the GRETINA array using the recoil-distance method. The present measurements provide a model-independent determination of transition strengths giving the values of $B(M1;1/{2}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}3/{2}_{\mathrm{g}.\mathrm{s}.}^{+})=1.{04}_{\ensuremath{-}0.12}^{+0.03}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}2}{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{N}^{2}$ and $B(M1;5/{2}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}3/{2}_{\mathrm{g}.\mathrm{s}.}^{+})=7.{12}_{\ensuremath{-}0.96}^{+1.27}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}2}{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{N}^{2}$. The quenched $M1$ transition strength for the $1/{2}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}3/{2}_{\mathrm{g}.\mathrm{s}.}^{+}$ transition, with respect to the $5/{2}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}3/{2}_{\mathrm{g}.\mathrm{s}.}^{+}$ transition, has been confirmed with greater precision. The current data are compared to importance-truncated no-core shell model calculations addressing effects due to continuum and three-body forces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207