MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

WHO-lnternational Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health—Development and Canadian content

2002· article· en· W2340565269 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sharon Brintnell, Tsuyoshi Sato, Hiromi Yoshikawa

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthMultidisciplinary approachContext (archaeology)Perspective (graphical)Occupational sciencePsychologyOccupational therapyMedical educationGerontologyMedicineApplied psychologyRehabilitationPsychiatryPhysical therapySociologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The WHO's International Classification of Functioning, and Disability (ICF) has evolved from an extended multidisciplinary international revision of the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) and its research version, the ICIDH-2 beta version. This broader perspective of health addresses the person environment interaction and tisd context which are a major focus for occupational therapists. It provides exciting opportunities for research on the interactive nature of human functioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Federation of Occupational Therapists BulletinSame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207