MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W23406334 · doi:10.1111/sdi.12060

Аллельные формы гена бета-цепи интегрина как фактор генетической предрасположенности к некоторым гинекологическим заболеваниям

2003· article· en· W23406334 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
О. О. Гигани, Н. И. Буянова, С. Л. Соколова, A.V. Itkes, Э. Х. Фахрутдинова, О. Д. Лобанова, Н. Ю. Григорьева, В. Е. Радзинский, Т. Е. Самойлова, В П Сметник

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Медицина · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenotypeMyomaMedicineAlleleUterusEndometriosisGenetic predispositionGynecologyPregnancyInternal medicineGastroenterologyBiologyGeneGeneticsDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrin receptors defects cause genetic predisposition to series of diseases such as myocardial infarction, myo-cardial ischemia, arterial and venous thrombosis, Glanzmann thrombasthenia, late gestosis and delay in fetus development. One of the integrins, glycoprotein Ilia (GPIIla) is known to be presented with two allelic forms, PLA1 and PLA2. We analyzed the frequency of these alleles among patients with uterus myoma, internal endometriosis and their combination, and obstetric bleeding. We have shown that presence of the defective allele PLA2 of the GPIIla gene in the female genotype is not a factor of genetic risk for development of uterus myoma. However, allele PLA2 in the female genotype considerably reduces the risk of development of internal endometriosis or internal endometriosis and uterus myoma together. Besides, the frequency of obstetric bleeding increases among the PLA2 allele carriers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueВестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: МедицинаSame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207