MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340817640 · doi:10.3166/ts.33.73-94

Détection et classification automatique de signaux acoustiques de baleines à bec

2016· article· fr· W2340817640 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Odile Gérard, Craig Carthel, Stefano Coraluppi

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les baleines à bec sont difficiles à observer et font partie des espèces les plus sensibles au bruit anthropique. L’acoustique passive est donc un outil privilégié pour étudier ces espèces et minimiser l’impact du bruit. Cet article présente une méthode de reconnaissance automatique de signaux de baleines à bec, qui se décompose en trois étapes : la détection de transitoires, la classification individuelle d’un clic, et enfin l’association de clics en trains de clics, grâce à un tracker. L’association en trains de clics permet de renforcer la classification car un clic n’est pas émis seul. De plus les trains de clics ont des caractéristiques qui peuvent être typiques de l’espèce (l’intervalle entre les clics par exemple). Les résultats sur trois espèces de baleines à bec sont présentés : le mésoplodon de Blainville, la baleine à bec de Cuvier et le mésoplodon de Gervais. Les résultats obtenus sont très encourageants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207