MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340825244 · doi:10.7202/1035707ar

La coutume, source de droit au Cameroun

2016· article· fr· W2340825244 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue générale de droit · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Identity, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avant la colonisation, la coutume constituait au Cameroun, comme partout ailleurs en Afrique noire, l’unique source de droit. Mais, à leur arrivée, les autorités coloniales ont voulu abolir ce droit coutumier pour le remplacer par leur droit. Après leur départ, elles ont été relayées dans cette volonté par le législateur national. Malheureusement, ce droit imposé s’est heurté à l’indifférence, voire l’hostilité des populations, si bien qu’aujourd’hui, l’on assiste à un décalage entre le droit écrit, applicable et le droit coutumier réellement appliqué, tout au moins dans certaines matières considérées comme étant très personnelles. La coutume comme source de droit demeure donc une réalité. Dès lors, plutôt que de persévérer en vain dans ce désir d’anéantir le droit coutumier, il paraît plus judicieux de promouvoir un rapport de complémentarité, de parvenir à une symbiose entre les deux systèmes juridiques. Toutefois, la coutume, qui recèle bien des tares, devra au préalable en être dépouillée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it