MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of Age, Sex, Body Mass Index and APOE Genotype on Cardiovascular Biomarker Response to an n‐3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Supplementation

2013· article· en· W2340852930 on OpenAlexaffabout
Élisabeth Thifault, Hubert Cormier, Annie Bouchard‐Mercier, Iwona Rudkowska, Simone Lemieux, Patrick Couture, Marie‐Claude Vohl

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyBody mass indexApolipoprotein ETriglycerideApolipoprotein BPolyunsaturated fatty acidCholesterolInsulinGenotypeMedicineLipoproteinBiologyFatty acidDiseaseBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives To test whether age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and the apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) genotype are associated with the metabolic response to an n‐3 PUFA supplementation. Methods 210 subjects followed a 2‐wk run‐in period based on Canada's Food Guide, and underwent a 6‐wk 5g/d fish oil supplementation (1.9g of EPA + 1.1g of DHA). Biochemical markers such as plasma lipids, inflammatory markers, and glycemic parameters were measured. Results N‐3 PUFA supplementation was associated with a decrease of plasma triglyceride (TG) levels (p 0.0002) as well as with an increase of fasting glucose (FG) levels (p = 0.02). Age was associated with post‐intervention plasma total cholesterol (total‐C) (p = 0.01), low‐density‐lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) (p = 0.007), apolipoprotein B (Apo‐B) (p = 0.04) and insulin (p = 0.002) levels. Sex was associated with post‐intervention plasma high‐density‐lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C) levels (p = 0.02). BMI was associated with plasma FG (p = 0.02) and insulin levels (p <0.0001) after the supplementation. APOE genotype was associated with FG (p = 0.001) and C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels (p = 0.03) after the supplementation. Conclusion Results suggest that age, sex, BMI, and the APOE genotype contribute to the inter‐individual variability observed in the metabolic response to an n‐3 PUFA supplementation. Funding: CIHR MOP‐229488

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicFatty Acid Research and HealthFrench-language works237,207