MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340926565 · doi:10.1177/1077546315627242

Fault detection of gearboxes using synchro-squeezing transform

2016· article· en· W2340926565 on OpenAlexaff
Budhaditya Hazra, Ayan Sadhu, Sriram Narasimhan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vibration and Control · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHilbert–Huang transformSynchroRobustness (evolution)Fault detection and isolationTime–frequency analysisWavelet transformInstantaneous phaseContinuous wavelet transformCondition monitoringEngineeringVibrationFault (geology)Computer scienceNoise (video)Pattern recognition (psychology)Control theory (sociology)WaveletArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineeringDiscrete wavelet transformComputer visionAcousticsActuator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel fault detection method for gearbox vibration signatures using the synchro-squeezing transform (SST). Premised upon the concept of time-frequency (TF) reassignment, the SST provides a sharp representation of signals in the TF plane compared to many popular TF methods. Additionally, it can also extract the individual components, called intrinsic mode functions or IMFs, of a nonstationary multi-component signal, akin to empirical mode decomposition. The rich mathematical structure based on the continuous wavelet transform makes synchro-squeezing a promising candidate for gearbox diagnosis, as such signals are frequently constituted out of multiple amplitude and frequency modulated signals embedded in noise. This work utilizes the decomposing power of the SST to extract the IMFs from gearbox signals, followed by the application of both condition indicators and fault detection to gearbox vibration data. For robust detection of faults in gear-motors, a fault detection technique based on time-varying auto-regressive coefficients of IMFs as features is utilized. The sequential Karhunen–Loeve transform is employed on the condition indicators to select the appropriate window sizes on which the SST can be applied. This approach promises improved fault detection capability compared to applying condition indicators directly to the raw data. Laboratory experimental data obtained from a drivetrain diagnostics simulator and seeded fault tests from a helicopter gearbox provide test beds to demonstrate the robustness of the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vibration and ControlSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207