MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2340929200

La ecuación personal del analista en el psicoanálisis con pacientes perversos

2007· article· es· W2340929200 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rodolfo Moguillansky

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Treatments and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPerversionPhilosophyArtSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mi intervencion en este Panel,* dedicada a explorar como interviene la ecuacion personal del analista en el psicoanalisis con pacientes perversos, tendra como telon de fondo mis ponencias en los Paneles sobre Perversion en el – frustrado – IPACongress de Toronto del 2001 (Rodolfo Moguillansky, 2001 b) y en el IPACongress de Rio de Janeiro del 2005 (Rodolfo Moguillansky, 2005). En aquellos textos –que siguen una linea conductora en la que vengo escribiendo hace anos (Moguillansky, R. et al, 1991; Moguillansky, R., 1999; Moguillansky, R, 2001 b; Moguillansky, R, 2005)–, planteaba que la perversion es una entidad per se, con peculiaridades en la construccion de la fantasia –fundadas en la escision del Yo y la desmentida de la castracion–1 que explican en

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPsychological Treatments and DisordersFrench-language works237,207