MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341024565

A systematic review of treatment of drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in children.

2011· review· en· W2341024565 on OpenAlexaff
Del Pozzo-Magana Br, Alejandro Lazo‐Langner, Bruce Carleton, Lucila I. Castro‐Pastrana, Rieder Mj

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToxic epidermal necrolysisMedicineMucocutaneous zoneMethylprednisoloneCochrane LibraryDermatologyDexamethasonePrednisoloneObservational studyMEDLINEPediatricsSurgeryInternal medicineDiseaseRandomized controlled trial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stevens-Johnson (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) are two uncommon mucocutaneous diseases usually considered as severe drug reactions and are characterized by different grades of epidermal necrosis. Several treatment modalities have been proposed with variable results but the lack of controlled studies makes difficult to analyze them objectively especially in children. All publications describing management for SJS and TEN in children were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Reports included were divided in two categories: A, studies with 5 or more patients and observational studies; and B, reports with less than 5 patients. A formal meta-analysis was not feasible. Description was made using central tendency measures. From 1389 references only 31 references with a total of 128 cases were included, 88 category A and 40 category B. The 4 main treatment modalities were: intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), steroids (prednisolone, methylprednisolone, dexamethasone), dressings with or without surgical debridement, and support treatment alone. Miscellaneous treatments: Of 12 patients, 3 received ulinastatin, 4 patients plasmapheresis, 2 patients IV pentoxifylline and the last three patients received different treatment each (cyclosporine, methylprednisone/G-CSF and methylprednisolone/IVIG). Patients receiving IVIG and steroids showed similar findings while patients treated with dressing and support treatment alone, reported both longer time to achieve remission and hospitalization stays and appear to be associated with more complications and deaths. There is scant quality literature about management of SJS and TEN in children. Steroids and IVIG seem to improve the outcome of SJS and TEN patients but results from different reports are variable. Patients treated only with care support seem to have higher morbidity and mortality. Further studies are necessary to define optimal management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.005
Bibliometrics0.0120.016
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFrench-language works237,207