MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2341040877

Geotechnical Considerations from the June 2013 Southern Alberta Flood

2015· article· en· W2341040877 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roger Kevin. Skirrow

Bibliographic record

VenueTAC 2015: Getting You There Safely - 2015 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada // ATC: Destination sécurité routière - 2015 Congrès et Exposition de l'Association des transports du Canada · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeohazardClimate changeFlood mythNatural (archaeology)Natural hazardNatural disasterEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementCivil engineeringEnvironmental planningLandslideGeologyGeographyGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringMeteorology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change has the potential to create a cascade of impacts on interrelated and integrated systems. The capacity of natural systems and society to adapt to new extremes and vulnerabilities and to mitigate appropriately are being studied by scientists, policy makers, industry and others. With respect to highways or linear corridors, and more specifically, the geotechnical component of these structures there are expected and unexpected consequences to climate change. The geotechnical consequences are mostly related to changed conditions at known and potential geohazard locations and the mitigation of these geohazards where they intersect with existing highway corridors. This paper provides a brief overview of significant and likely consequences of climate change on geohazards that occur along Alberta highways. The major flood of June 2013 is used to support the assessment. The cause of climate change is not germane to this discussion; this paper accepts the notion that climate change is or will occur through natural cycles and anthropogenic inputs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTAC 2015: Getting You There Safely - 2015 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada // ATC: Destination sécurité routière - 2015 Congrès et Exposition de l'Association des transports du Canada→Same topicLandslides and related hazards→French-language works237,207→