Variabilité, identité spécifique et numérique des oeuvres contemporaines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La réexposition d’oeuvres contemporaines sous la forme de la présentation de nouveaux exemplaires physiques d’une oeuvre conçue pour être unique questionne les notions de variabilité, d’identité spécifique et numérique de l’oeuvre d’art. Dans cet article, Couture étudie trois cas de figure propres à cette réalité : la production d’une réplique ou d’une copie d’exposition, l’exposition d’un élément d’une oeuvre, non pas comme un fragment, mais comme une oeuvre autonome, et enfin l’exemple particulier de l’actualisation d’un énoncé verbal qui est porteur des valeurs d’unicité et de singularité attribuées à l’oeuvre d’art. Elle conclut qu’il en résulte une transformation de l’institution muséale et de l’artiste engendrant notamment une redéfinition des rôles de chacun.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".