MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341104191

Review: pathology of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

2004· article· en· W2341104191 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Peden, James W. Ironside

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBovine spongiform encephalopathyDiseaseInfectivityHistopathologyTransmissible spongiform encephalopathyMedicineCreutzfeldt-Jakob SyndromePathologicalKuruPopulationPathologyVirologyBiologyPrion proteinScrapieVirusEnvironmental health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) is a novel human prion disease that results from exposure to the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) agent, probably by the oral route. The pathological features of vCJD are unique, with extensive involvement of lymphoid tissues in addition to the central nervous system. This article reviews the histopathology and biochemistry of vCJD, emphasising diagnostic features and indicating several areas of active research. The widespread distribution of infectivity in lymphoid tissues in vCJD has lead to concerns over the possibility of iatrogenic disease transmission by contaminate surgical instruments, or by blood transfusion. vCJD has so far only occurred in individuals within a genetic subset defined by the natural polymorphism at codon 129 in the prion protein gene. It remains uncertain if this disease will occur in other genetic subgroups within the population. Continuing surveillance of vCJD in the UK and other countries in which BSE has been identified will be necessary for future estimations of disease numbers worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingFrench-language works237,207