Robust equivalent tunnelling Mohr–Coulomb strength parameters for generalised Hoek–Brown media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel robust method for estimating equivalent tunnelling Mohr–Coulomb strength parameters in elastic–plastic or elasto–brittle–plastic media satisfying Hoek–Brown failure criterion is proposed. Based on the best uniform approximation technique, this method consists of explicit and closed-form formulae in terms of elementary functions, making the estimation of equivalent parameters more convenient than other methods. A simple code is provided and a series of benchmark test cases are performed for validation. When the tunnel support is accurately known, the performance estimates of this method are better than estimates of best fitting in an artificial stress range and best fitting in the existing range methods, but not as accurate as the performance of equating model responses method and that proposed by Jimenez et al. However, when the estimation of support pressure is poor, this method is the most robust among all methods. In elasto–brittle–plastic rock mass, the advantage of robustness of this method is even more obvious. Considering both accuracy and robustness, this method can be employed as a preferable alternative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".