MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341144241 · doi:10.1145/2904111.2904118

PACOFed

2016· article· en· W2341144241 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rizwan Panjwani, Sushil Bhojwani, Sudhakar Ganti, Rick McGeer, Yvonne Coady

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteroperabilityCloud computingComputer scienceModular designModular programmingAccess controlStandardizationLegacy systemComputer securityWorld Wide WebOperating systemSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud Federation allows users to not only access more resources, but also potentially optimize costs and diversify compliance regulations (US Patriot Act vs. Canadian Privacy Act). This paper describes our design and implementation of a Principled Access Control and Operations system, PACOFed, used to federate two research cloud systems spanning the US and Canada. PacoFed relies on a modular approach, minimizing the modifications to the underlying cloud systems, and allowing us to make the policies and mechanisms associated with access control and interoperability highly cohesive and explicit. We believe this approach could scale well with additional clouds, and outline the pros and cons of tackling commercial clouds using these advanced modularization techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed systems and fault toleranceFrench-language works237,207