MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341159769 · doi:10.4028/b-6gy4uu

Manufacturing Engineering and Process II

2013· book· en· W2341159769 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bale V. Reddy

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics and Materials · 2013
Typebook
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Manufacturing engineeringManufacturing processComputer scienceEngineeringEngineering drawingMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Collection of selected, peer reviewed papers from the ICMEP 2013 International Conference on Manufacturing Engineering and Process, April 13-14, 2013, Vancouver, Canada. The 373 papers are grouped as follows: Chapter 1: Advanced Materials Engineering and Technology; Chapter 2: General Mechanical Engineering;Chapter 3: Design Technology and Engineering;Chapter 4: Applied Thermodynamics, Heat Transfer, Energy Conversion; Chapter 5: Electrical Engineering and Electric Machines; Chapter 6: Power System and Energy Engineering: Its Applications; Chapter 7: Instrumentation, Measurement Technologies, Analysis and Methodology; Chapter 8: Electronics and Integrated Circuits, Embedded Technology and Applications; Chapter 9: Mechatronics and Robotics; Chapter 10: Modern Control, Automation and Reverse Engineering; Chapter 11: New Technology, Method and Technique in Civil Engineering; Chapter 12: Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, Management Applications; Chapter 13: Mathematics - in Particular, Calculus, Differential Equations, Statistics, and Linear Algebra; Chapter 14: Signal Processing and Data Mining;Chapter 15: Information Technologies and Networks: Its Applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Mechanics and MaterialsSame topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207