MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341169918 · doi:10.1017/9781846154164.011

Economy and Society in North-Eastern Market Towns: Darlington and Northallerton in the Later Middle Ages

2005· other· en· W2341169918 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christine M. Newman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecessionAgrarian societyFifteenthEconomic historyProsperityMiddle AgesEconomyGeographyHistoryAgricultureAncient historyArchaeologyEconomicsEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The economic history of north-eastern England in the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries is characterised by decline, with the region scarcely recovering from the economic and demographic ravages of the Black Death and subsequent outbreaks of plague before being plunged back into long-term recession. The main urban centres of the region, York and Newcastle-upon-Tyne, suffered considerable dislocation in the fifteenth century and remained in recession until well into the sixteenth. A major factor in the decline of York was the contraction of its cloth making industry, largely as a result of increased competition from the textile towns of the West Riding of Yorkshire, such as Leeds, Wakefield and Halifax. Smaller centres also suffered in this respect. John Leland's later description ( c. 1538) of Ripon as a town ‘where idleness is sore increased’ bore testimony to the fate of one such small town whose prosperity had once been founded upon the cloth trade. Another market town in decline was Richmond in the North Riding of Yorkshire. Its economy, too, was partially based upon the textile industry, although it was also an important marketing centre for corn and wool, being advantageously placed between the pastoral highlands of the Pennines and the lowland agricultural dales. However, the town suffered, apparently as a result of the great pestilence and agrarian crisis, which further undermined the north-eastern economy in the period 1438–40. By 1440, the burgesses of Richmond felt compelled to appeal to the crown for a reduction in the town's fee farm, citing a contracting population and competition from the numerous neighbouring markets (which were, undoubtedly, vying for the limited amount of trade) as the main reasons for the town's decline. Nevertheless, the region maintained the principal elements of its marketing structure, as this had developed during the two centuries before 1300. Margaret Bonney's study of Durham, for instance, illustrates how that city managed to maintain a reasonable level of economic stability because there was no significant export industry to suffer from native or foreign competition. Durham, indeed, functioned primarily as a service centre for the twin ecclesiastical administrations of the priory and the bishop, as well as providing marketing facilities for the rural hinterland. Other, less well-known urban communities which also managed to survive as viable marketing centres at this time were the small north-eastern market towns of Darlington and Northallerton.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207