Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, «About the Internet Imaginary and its evolution», which short version was first published in December 2006 on the Contemporaneous Art International Center (CIAC) Electronic Magazine of Montreal, http://www.ciac.ca/magazine/sommaire.htm, I put the focus on the Internet Imaginary evolution, in a historical and philosophical way. Since more than 150 years, writers, poets, philosophers have imagined that some day, the networks will allow man to be near to anyone, near to the artworks, near to the books etc... So, after having clarify in what meaning I use the term «imaginary», I try to look at some art works, some social behaviours, that shows us something as an Internet Imaginary, and the evolution of this imaginary. First, I notice how the networks have been the scene of contact and travel, since Marcel Proust «Telephone Ladies» to the novel Neromancer. Secondly, I search how men have conquered Internet to make him a place to stay, and to accumulate immateriel goods – which will correspond to the web 2.0. And last, I show, how Internet has act as a substitute scene of religion, and how the evil has taken its place on it. My article has the aim to analyse the distorsions between the real social network that Internet is and how the imaginary as depict it – so that we can see it how it is realy. A first version of this article was published in December 2006 on the electronic magazine of the International Center of Contemporary art of Montreal, on http://www.ciac.ca/magazine/
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".