MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341547092

Open Mentor: a tool to get feedback on your feedback

2013· article· fr· W2341547092 on OpenAlexaff
Stylianos Hatzipanagos, Paul Gillary, L. D. Gilbert, A Recio Saucedo, DM Whitelock, Sal Watt, P Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueRevistes Científiques de la University of Barcelona (University of Barcelona) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReflective Practices in Education
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaxonomy (biology)Computer sciencePsychologyMedical educationMedicineEcologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Open Mentor (OM) was conceived as a tool to support tutors' feedback practices by classifying comments added to an assignment using Bales interaction analysis taxonomy and reporting the results of the analysis in summarized views.This report will explain Bale’s Taxonomy and describe the evaluation that was carried out at King’s College London, the University of Southampton and the Open University, UK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevistes Científiques de la University of Barcelona (University of Barcelona)Same topicReflective Practices in EducationFrench-language works237,207