MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 16108: Right Ventricular Strain is a More Sensitive Marker of Right Ventricular Dysfunction Than Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction in a Cohort of Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

2014· article· en· W2341615265 on OpenAlexaff
Julia Grapsa, Timothy C. Tan, David M. Dawson, Petros Nihoyannopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsDawson College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineEjection fractionVentriclePulmonary hypertensionStroke volumeSubclinical infectionCohortHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Strain has been shown to be more sensitive that ejection fraction in detecting subclinical dysfunction in the left ventricle. A number of echocardiographic parameters associated with right heart size and function have been shown to be impaired in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) but there is minimal data on which may be the most sensitive. Aim: To characterize the changes in functional and echocardiographic indices of right ventricular (RV) size and function, in a cohort of IPAH patients followed serially to determine if strain is a more sensitive measure of RV dysfunction than RVEF. Methods: Thirty patients (24 women, mean age 46.8 ± 5.3 years) with newly diagnosed IPAH were prospectively recruited and followed with serial transthoracic echocardiograms (TTE; Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA) 6 monthly for up to 18 months. A range of 2D and 3D echocardiographic measures of right ventricular dimensions and function, including right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and systolic longitudinal strain (LS), was assessed at each time point after commencing treatment using vendor independent software (TomTec, Germany). Functional status was assessed at18 months. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP statistical package (SAS Institute In. Cary, NC) Results: 3D RV volumes, ejection fraction, mass, 2D global strain and 2D free wall strain all show significant changes over 18 months (p-value < 0.05; ANOVA of repeated measures) although peak tricuspid regurgitant velocity, RV systolic pressure and stroke volume do not. However, RV global strain and RV free wall strain showed significant changes within 6 months after diagnosis but not RVEF, peak TR velocity or RVSP. The degree of change in the RV free wall strain change at 18 months but not RVSP, RV mass or RVEF, was also associated with an abnormal 6 min walk test (18 months change, p=0.03). Conclusion: RV global and free wall strain demonstrate significant decreases prior to RVEF, peak TR velocity and RVSP hence may be more more sensitive measures of RV dysfunction in patients with IPAH. These results may help guide treatment decisions and highlight the potential value of echocardiography in detecting subacute cardiac pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→