MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341867694 · doi:10.14288/1.0071576

Real-time interactive retinal vessel segmentation and analysis

2011· article· en· W2341867694 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan Dickie

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationComputer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceRetinalComputer graphics (images)MedicineOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vessel analysis is important for a wide range of clinical diagnoses and disease research such as diabetes and malignant brain tumours. Vessel segmentation is a crucial first step in such analysis but is often complicated by structural diversity and pathology. Existing automated techniques have mixed results and difficulties with non-idealities such as imaging artifacts, tiny vessel structures, and regions with bifurcations. Live-Vessel is a novel and intuitive semi-automatic vessel segmentation technique that extends the classic Live-Wire technique from user-guided contours to user guided paths along vessel centre-lines with automated boundary detection. Live-Vessel achieves this by globally optimizing vessel filter responses over both spatial (x,y) and non-spatial (radius) variables simultaneously. In this thesis I provide three main contributions. First, I bring Live-Vessel into the domain of real-time interactivity. Second, I enhance the objective function for improved contrast and graph search performance by incorporating colour image information, adding penalty terms, utilizing a smaller data type, and increasing the contrast between desirable and undesirable paths. Third, I gather and retain vessel connectivity information and provide post-segmentation analysis tools. I validated this technique using real medical data from the DRIVE, STARE, and REVIEW retina vessel databases. Quantitative results show that, on average, Live-Vessel resulted in an 7.28 times reduction in overall manual segmentation task time at a 95% accuracy level with most radial and medial errors being under 1 pixel in distance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score0.895

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207