MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341908736 · doi:10.18192/rceh.v40i1.1608

Duelo por el padre y duelo por la patria. La poliatría en El olvido que seremos (2006), de Héctor Abad Faciolince

2015· article· es· W2341908736 on OpenAlex
Kristine Vanden Berghe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtEmblemLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 2006, casi dos décadas después del asesinato de su padre, Héctor Abad Faciolince publicó una novela sobre este crimen titulada El olvido que seremos. En la medida en que sugiere múltiples relaciones entre la familia y la nación, y entre el padre y la patria, el libro supone un importante análisis revisionista del reciente pasado colombiano. Al mismo tiempo estas relaciones – sobre todo de contraste – suscitan la pregunta de saber hasta qué punto la memoria construida por el escritor – que en principio se presenta como incomparable y literal – tiene un valor emblemático y colectivo. Por los temas que aborda, el libro incita asimismo a reflexionar en torno al papel que pueden desempeñar la belleza y el olvido en los procesos de duelo. En la presente contribución estudiaremos estos temas en la novela del escritor antioqueño, situándolos en el marco más general de las letras colombianas e hispanoamericanas contemporáneas que tratan de la violencia en el reciente pasado histórico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it