MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341951168 · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.04.003

Recent developments in the ABINIT software package

2016· article· en· W2341951168 on OpenAlexafffund
Xavier Gonze, F. Jollet, Flavio Abreu Araujo, Donat J. Adams, Bernard Amadon, Thomas Applencourt, Christophe Audouze, J.-M. Beuken, Jordan Bieder, A. Bokhanchuk, Éric Bousquet, Fabien Bruneval, Damien Caliste, Michel Côté, Francine Dahm, Fabiana Da Pieve, M. Delaveau, Marco Di Gennaro, Boris Dorado, C. Espejo, Grégory Geneste, Luigi Genovese, Alexis Gérossier, Matteo Giantomassi, Yannick Gillet, D. R. Hamann, Lianlong He, Gérald Jomard, Jonathan Laflamme Janssen, Sébastien Le Roux, Antoine Levitt, Aurélien Lherbier, Fang Liu, Igor Lukačević, Alexandre Martin, Cyril Martins, Micael J. T. Oliveira, Samuel Poncé, Yann Pouillon, Tonatiuh Rangel, Gian‐Marco Rignanese, A. Romero, Bruno Rousseau, Oleg Rubel, Abdullah Atef Shukri, Martin Stankovski, Marc Torrent, Michiel J. van Setten, Benoît Van Troeye, Matthieu J. Verstraete, David Waroquiers, Julia Wiktor, Bin Xu, Ai-Hua Zhou, Josef W. Zwanziger

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Physics Communications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalThunder Bay Regional Research InstituteConfederation College
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchEuropean Regional Development FundFonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’AgricultureEuropean Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaScience Fund for Creative Research GroupsFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaGrand Équipement National De Calcul IntensifAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsSoftwareComputer scienceSoftware packageSoftware engineeringProgramming languageComputational science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.051

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations883
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueComputer Physics CommunicationsSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207