MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2341952046

Bioefficacy of three promising predators on Myzus nicotianae Blackman (Homoptera: Aphididae).

2010· article· en· W2341952046 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K. S. Jagadish, M. Jayaramaiah, B. Shivayogeshwara

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biopesticides · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural pest management studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAphidAphididaeBiologyPredationHomopteraHorticultureToxicologyPopulationChrysoperla carneaBotanyPEST analysisPredatorChrysopidaeEcologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coccinella transversalis Fab., Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fab.) and Chrysoperla carnea Stephens were evaluated for their bio-efficacy against the tobacco aphid, Myzus nicotianae Blackman under field conditions. Based on the results of a feeler trial under greenhouse conditions, the predators were tested at two dosages of release (i.e., 8 and 16 larvae/plant) and three schedules of release (i.e one release @5 weeks after planting (WAP), two releases @ at 5 & 7 WAP and three releases @ 5, 7 & 9 WAP. The efficacy of the predators was measured in terms of the density of the aphid, both before and after the release of the predators, besides estimating the reduction in the density of the aphid at 6, 8 and 10 WAP. Among the three predators evaluated, C. transversalis gave the significantly highest reduction in aphid density at 6 WAP (54.38%), 8 WAP (60.42%) and 10 WAP (59.96%), thus indicating that C.transversalis was relatively more superior then the other two predators in the suppression of the aphid population under field conditions. INTRODUCTION The current total global production of tobacco is 6 billion kg. Nearly one-third of India’s total tobacco production comprises of Virginia flue-cured (VFC) tobacco which is utilized in the manufacture of cigarettes. It is the principal export-oriented variety of tobacco and as much as 50 per cent of India‘s total production of VFC tobacco is exported to foreign countries. India produces about 300 million kg. of VFC tobacco and occupies third place after China and USA (Anonymous, 2009). Among the tobacco growing states Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Gujarat are important. In Karnataka, VFC Tobacco production is mainly concentrated in the districts of Mysore, Shimoga and Hassan. However, tobacco is plagued by several insect pests throughout its growth and developmental stages, of which the tobacco aphid, Myzus nicotianae Blackman (Homoptera : Aphididae) assumes significance, particularly since it not only feeds on the plant sap but also produces honeydew on which sooty mould grows and spoils the leaf quality (McPherson et al., 1989), the aphid activity also hinders the curing process of VFC Tobacco and it is also known to transmit several viral diseases. This pest has got serious implications on VFC Tobacco production, particularly considering the fact that India is one of the top twelve flue-cured tobacco producers in the world. India occupies second place in area, third place in production and eighth place in exports of VFC Tobacco (Chari, 1995). The aphid, M. nicotianae has been reported to be most serious in USA during 1987 and 1988 and also in south eastern Canada (Lampert, 1989). This pest broke out in epidemic form in Andhra Pradesh during 1990-91 and 1991-92 seasons, during which the economic threshold level (ETL) has been estimated to be around 2 per cent or lesser (Anon, 199293). In this context, feeler studies conducted under laboratory and green house proved the usefulness of 3 predators, viz., C. transversalis, C. sexmaculata and C. carnea in the suppression of the aphid . Therefore, the present investigation was conducted to evaluate their performance in actual field situation so as to develop suitable bio-control strategies for the management of this pest in VFC tobacco. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bioefficacy of C. transversalis, C. sexmaculata and C. carnea of these predators were tested at the following dosages and schedules, which was decided based on the results of the feeler study conducted earlier under green house conditions in two doses like D1 [8 larvae/plant (early second instar larvae)] and D2 [16 larvae/plant (early second instar larvae)] with three release schedules viz., S1 [one release/spray at 5 week after planting (WAP)], S2 [two release/sprays, one each at 5 & 7 WAP)] and S3 [three release/sprays, one each at 5, 7 & 9 WAP)]. Monocrotophos (@ 2 ml/litre) was used as the standard recommended check. The design of the experiment followed was three factor RCBD with three replications. Each treatment plot was separated from the neighboring treatments by a distance of 1 metre all around the plot. One observation on aphid density was recorded one day © JBiopest. 96 Predators on Myzus nicotianae

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BiopesticidesSame topicAgricultural pest management studiesFrench-language works237,207