<i>CPJ</i> and CPhA: Taking evidence for pharmacist care to the next level
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Back in the September/October 2015 issue, we announced our sharpened focus on what’s important for pharmacy practice—to highlight evidence for pharmacist care, provide implementation tools and guidelines and deepen our understanding of practice change.1 In May 2015, the new board of the Canadian Pharmacists Association (CPhA) developed a number of strategic priorities, several of which are directly addressed by CPJ. These include helping pharmacists navigate the transformation to a more service-based practice (patient-centred care) by providing leading process and service models, educational resources, practice tools and evidence/data; providing the opportunity for knowledge transfer and thought leadership with our member organizations, pharmacists and key stakeholders; and sharing success with members and associates by collaborating and leveraging our strengths and resources. Because of this, CPJ is now being made available to all members of provincial pharmacy associations (as well as some national associations) across Canada. The print circulation of CPJ has now quadrupled to over 17,000 copies. We are also delivering print copies to provincial and federal-level health policy makers and other health professional organizations. Together, we will publicize and advocate for the important evidence from pharmacy practice research. For researchers, if you have work that provides evidence for pharmacist care, you can be assured that you have CPJ and CPhA behind you to change practice (how good is that?). We will make sure your evidence makes a difference, and we will do that better than anyone else can. For health policy makers, you need look no further than CPJ for evidence you can use to improve patient care by engaging pharmacists. For pharmacists, we are here to help you in the transition. To provide the tools you need to advocate for remuneration and to support you. From here forward, things will be different. You will see the strength of our evidence. You will see the power of advocacy, of change. Read on. For those who thought the world would end when pharmacists gained the privilege of ordering laboratory tests, in this issue of the journal, we present evidence to the contrary. In this study (see pages 13-17),2 pharmacists applied the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Pathway targeted screening guidelines (published in the September/October issue of CPJ3) to 720 patients at high risk for cardiovascular events, as part of the RxEACH study.4 In applying these guidelines, pharmacists assessed renal function, sending patients to the laboratory for bloodwork. They found 283 patients with CKD, 40% of whom were previously unrecognized as having this condition. That’s 113 patients who didn’t know their renal function was declining, didn’t have the doses of their medications adjusted and may not have known they were at high risk for cardiovascular death. And they found this out because their pharmacists ordered appropriate lab tests. Yup, that changes everything. So, in keeping with our new direction, we are taking these findings forward to make a difference. We are issuing a media release. We are providing these materials to our provincial counterparts and policy makers. We are starting the advocacy machine. Welcome to a new, bolder world. We will move forward with evidence on our side and change patient care. ■ Dans le numero de septembre-octobre 2015, nous annoncions notre interet accru pour ce qui est important dans l’exercice de la pharmacie : mettre en avant les donnees sur les soins dispenses par les pharmaciens, fournir des outils et des lignes directrices concernant la mise en œuvre et approfondir nos connaissances sur l’evolution des pratiques1. En mai 2015, le nouveau conseil d’administration de l’Association des pharmaciens du Canada (APhC) a defini un certain nombre de priorites strategiques, dont plusieurs sont directement traitees dans la RPC. Il s’agit notamment d’aider les pharmaciens a s’y retrouver dans la transformation vers un exercice davantage axe sur les services (soins axes sur le patient) en fournissant des modeles phares en matiere de processus et de service, des ressources pedagogiques, des outils pour la pratique et des donnees, en offrant des occasions d’echange de connaissances et de leadership intellectuel avec nos organisations membres, les pharmaciens et les intervenants cles, et en partageant nos reussites avec les membres et les associes par la collaboration et la mise a profit de nos points forts et de nos ressources. Pour cette raison, la RPC est desormais accessible a tous les membres des associations de pharmacie provinciales (ainsi que certaines associations nationales) de l’ensemble du Canada. La circulation de la version papier de la RPC a quadruple et atteint maintenant plus de 17 000 exemplaires. Nous livrons egalement des versions papier aux decideurs provinciaux et federaux ainsi qu’a d’autres organisations de professionnels de la sante. Ensemble, nous ferons la promotion des donnees importantes issues des etudes sur l’exercice de la pharmacie. En tant que chercheur, si votre travail apporte des donnees sur les soins dispenses par les pharmaciens, sachez que vous avez le soutien de la RPC et l’APhC pour faire evoluer notre pratique (ce n’est pas beau, ca?). Nous veillerons a ce que vos resultats aient des effets concrets et nous sommes les mieux places pour y parvenir. Si vous etes decideur dans le domaine de la sante, la RPC vous fournit des donnees que vous pouvez appliquer en vue d’ameliorer les soins aux patients en mobilisant les pharmaciens. En ce qui concerne les pharmaciens, nous sommes la pour vous aider a effectuer la transition, vous fournir les outils dont vous avez besoin pour demander une juste remuneration et vous soutenir. A partir de maintenant, les choses vont changer. Vous pourrez constater la force de nos donnees. Vous verrez egalement a quel point la promotion du changement peut etre efficace. Allez-y, lisez! Pour ceux qui pensaient que les pharmaciens n’obtiendraient jamais le privilege de demander des analyses de laboratoire, nous apportons la preuve du contraire dans ce numero de la revue. Dans cette etude (voir aux pages 13-17)2, des pharmaciens ont applique les lignes directrices sur le depistage cible recommandees dans le CKD Clinical Pathway (chemin clinique pour la nephropathie chronique) (directives publiees dans le numero de septembre-octobre de la RPC3) aupres de 720 patients presentant des risques eleves d’evenement cardiovasculaire, dans le cadre de l’essai RxEACH4. Ce faisant, les pharmaciens ont evalue la fonction renale des patients et les ont envoyes faire des analyses de sang. Leur intervention a permis de detecter une nephropathie chronique chez 283 patients, et dans 40 % des cas, ce trouble n’avait jamais ete detecte auparavant. Cela correspond a 113 patients qui ne savaient pas que leur fonction renale se deteriorait, dont la posologie n’etait pas ajustee pour les medicaments qu’ils prenaient, et qui ne savaient peut-etre pas qu’ils presentaient des risques eleves de mort d’origine cardiovasculaire. Ils ont decouvert tout cela grâce aux analyses de sang demandees par leur pharmacien. Eh oui, ca change tout. Par consequent, dans la continuite de notre nouvelle orientation, nous allons utiliser ces resultats pour faire avancer les choses. Nous allons publier un communique de presse. Nous allons distribuer ces documents a nos homologues provinciaux et aux decideurs. En d’autres termes, nous lancons la « machine a promotion ». Bienvenue dans un monde nouveau, plus audacieux. Nous appliquerons les nouvelles donnees de notre cote pour changer les soins dispenses aux patients. ■
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.132 | 0.432 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.038 | 0.033 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.043 | 0.061 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".