MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2342133820

Pierre Lombard, Les Quatre Livres des Sentences, Deuxième Livre. Introduction, traduction, notes et tables par Marc Ozilou. Paris, Les Éditions du Cerf (« Sagesses chrétiennes »), 2013

2016· article· fr· W2342133820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Camille Rouxpetel

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Philosophique de Louvain · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyFrenchArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apres la publication, entre 2007 et 2010, de la traduction anglaise du Livre des Sentences par Giulio Silano (Toronto, Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies), cette traduction francaise de Marc Ozilou a le merite de rendre accessible a un lectorat francophone, non latiniste, une œuvre essentielle a la comprehension de l’evolution de la theologie et de l’exegese biblique a partir du xiie siecle, tant cet ouvrage, par les discussions et les commentaires qu’il a suscites, a ete fondateur « da...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Philosophique de LouvainSame topicMedieval European Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207