MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2342257009 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofv133.34

What Accounts for a Large Increase in Antibiotic Prescribing by Dentists?

2015· article· en· W2342257009 on OpenAlexaffabout
David M. Patrick, Fawziah Marra, Diana George, Mei Chong, John O’Keefe, Edith Blondel-Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAntibiotic Use and Resistance
Canadian institutionsInterior HealthBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAntibioticsFamily medicineGerontologyIntensive care medicineMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. While community antibiotic use by physicians has been declining in British Columbia (BC), we launched this study to begin to explain a troubling trend toward increased prescribing by dentists. Methods. All outpatient prescriptions are entered in the BC Pharmanet database. We obtained anonymized, line-listed data on prescriptions from 1996 to 2013, including a variable coding for licensing body of the prescriber. Analyses were conducted in SAS and Excel using Anatomical Therapeutic Classification (ATC) standard codes and defined daily dose values. Rates of prescribing and utilization were normalized to the BC population and expressed in defined daily doses per 1000 persons per day (DID). To evaluate the reasons for trends, a webinar was held through the Canadian Dental Association, inviting correspondence from dentists about the drivers of antibiotic use in practice. Results. From 1996 to 2013, overall community antibiotic use in BC declined from 18.2 to 15.9 DID and physician prescribing for antibiotics declined 18.2% from 17.4 to 14.1 DID. However, dental surgeons increased their rate 62.2% from 0.98 to 1.59 DID and their proportionate contribution of prescriptions from 6.7% to 11.3%. The rate of prescribing increased the most for dental patients aged 60 and over. We had 30 communications from US and Canadian dentists in response to the webinar and the following explanatory themes emerged: unnecessary prescription for periapical abscess and irreversible pulpitis; increase in use of dental implants and associated complications; slow adoption of newer guidelines calling for less perioperative antibiotic coverage for patients with valvular heart disease and prosthetic joints; emphasis on cosmetic practice reducing the surgical skill-set of the average dentist; under-insurance driving antibiotics as a substitute for surgery; aging population; and more dental registrants per capita. Conclusion. The above themes should be further validated in other studies but may already guide priorities in antibiotic stewardship for continuing dental education. Disclosures. F. Marra, Merck Canada Inc: Grant Investigator, Research grant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntibiotic Use and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207