MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2342279918

GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ TIP FAKÜLTESİNDE AKILCI İLAÇ KULLANIMI STAJININ TEMELLERİNİN ATILMASINDA ULUSLAR ARASI İŞBİRLİĞİNİN VE FARMAKOLOG-KLİNİSYEN ORTAKLIĞININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

2007· article· tr· W2342279918 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zafer Güney, Canan Uluoğlu, Didem Arman, Rana Olguntürk, Nuri Çakır, A Dursun, Tunaoğlu Fs

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2007
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamilies in Therapy and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrainerMedical educationSubject (documents)Scope (computer science)MedicinePsychologyLibrary scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the manuscript is to share our experience with other faculties that are planning to start RPT training by presenting the content and the results of an education model while building the roots of Rational Pharmacotherapy clerkship for the fifth year students in Gazi University Medical School (GUMS). In that way we aim to. Before the training, GUMS has organised a 3- day workshop with Dalhousie University School of Medicine- Canada in order to determine and to inform the academic staff who are interested in RPT. Another aim of the workshop was to help both pharmacologists and clinicans to understand the importance of the subject and increase their interest to the field of RPT. 60 people from various fields attended the workshop. All attendants agreed that RPT training should take part during the undergraduate medical education. A few months later, all academic faculty who wanted to train the students also attended the “ Training of Trainers” course for 7 days. 11 clinicians from 8 different fields and 3 pharmacologists took role as a trainer during the RPT training. In this model, RPT training is repeated in 9 groups and one clinician and one pharmacologist acted as a trainer in each group. Although the notes from the workshop and the clerkship have been introduced in details in the manuscript, the feedback of the students and the trainers for the clerkship revealed that, this model gave an oppurtunity to students to work one to one with clinicians from different fields and helped clinicians to understand the scope of pharmacologists in the selection of the appropiate drugs and the importance of RPT training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDergiPark (Istanbul University)Same topicFamilies in Therapy and CultureFrench-language works237,207