L’état de la recherche en travail social dans les communautés francophones minoritaires au Canada : une topographie thématique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente un inventaire thématique des écrits scientifiques sur le travail social en contexte francophone minoritaire depuis les années 1990 et cherche à stimuler une réflexion sur les rapports entre la recherche et les communautés francophones minoritaires au Canada. La description des thèmes de recherche montre un dynamisme certain de la recherche, une grande diversité d’intérêts, une prédilection pour certaines thématiques dont celles de la santé et de l’intervention auprès des femmes et des personnes immigrantes. Mais il y aussi une absence d’écrits sur certains groupes dont les autochtones, et sur les milieux institutionnels d’intervention. Ces résultats s’expliquent notamment par la structuration des communautés et les conditions de la recherche en milieu francophone minoritaire, et permettent de tracer des voies pour la recherche à l’avenir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".