Antifungal ocular drug delivery via contact lenses using a novel in vitro eye model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: \nThe purpose of this thesis was to evaluate the potential of contact lenses (CLs) as an antifungal drug delivery device, and to develop an in vitro eye model to test thereof. \n \nMethods: \nThe first three chapters focused on developing a CL to function as a drug delivery device for natamycin, the only commercially available antifungal: \n•\tIn the first experiment (Chapter 3), the in vitro uptake and release characteristics of natamycin from several commercially available CLs were evaluated \n•\tIn the second experiment (Chapter 4), to improve the release characteristics of natamycin from contact lenses, an attempt was made to incorporate novel drug-encapsulated nanoparticles (Dex-b-PLA) within the CLs \n•\tIn the third experiment (Chapter 5), an alternative strategy employing the incorporation of cyclodextrin (CDs) within the CL polymer matrix was evaluated as a potential modification to prolong the release of natamycin \nThe second half of the thesis was aimed at developing a sophisticated in vitro ocular model capable of adequately measuring drug release from CLs: \n•\tIn Chapter 6, the design of a novel in vitro eye model to simulate the physiological ocular environment was outlined \n•\tIn Chapter 7, this model was used to evaluate the release of the antifungal fluconazole from commercially daily disposable CLs \n•\tIn chapter 8, as an extension of the developed in vitro eye model, an agar eye model was developed to test the effects of natamycin and fluconazole-releasing CLs on Candida albicans \n \nResults \nCommercial CLs, after drug incubation with natamycin, will release the drug rapidly within the first half hour, followed by a plateau phase. However, when CL materials were loaded instead with natamycin encapsulated within novel Dex-b-PLA nanoparticles, the release duration was extended to 12 hours. Modifying the CL polymer with methacrylated CDs did not significantly improve drug release. On the contrary, high loading of CDs decreased overall drug delivery efficiency, likely resulting from unfavourable arrangements of the CDs within the polymer network. \nThe developed ocular platform, termed Ocuflow, simulates physiological tear flow, tear volume, air exposure and mechanical wear. When this system was used to analyze the release of fluconazole from commercial CLs, the drug release was sustained for up to 24 hours. This observation significantly contrasts drug release observed in a vial, which typically follows a burst-plateau profile. When CLs releasing natamycin and fluconazole were tested on agar eye models that were inoculated with Candida albicans, the growth of the yeast was limited by natamycin-containing CLs. The cell morphology of the yeast also differed noticeably based on drug-lens combinations. \n \nConclusions \nThis thesis details potential strategies to develop novel CLs for antifungal ocular drug delivery. The Ocuflow system developed from this thesis is highly versatile; not only can it be used effectively to measure drug release from CLs, but it can also be applied to other in vitro analyses with CLs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".