Investigations of argon and neon abnormal glow discharges in the presence of metastable atom density with fluid model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this manuscript an investigation of a DC argon and neon abnormal glow discharges with metastable atom density is presented. The values of pressure lie between 133.32 and 330 Pa, and the voltage ranges from 250 to 400 V in the case of argon gas. In the case of neon gas, the pressure has a value of 399.92 Pa (3 Torr) and the voltage ranges from 300 to 500 V. In this framework, an analysis of abnormal glow discharge characteristics is carried out in the case of input data taken from the Boltzmann equation in the multi-term approximation, and in the case of input data obtained from BOLISG+ code. With these differences of input data in the same gas, the output results are different; it appears in the cathodic region. The spatio-temporal distributions of electron and ion densities, the potential and electric field, the mean electron energy and the metastable atom density are shown. A 1D fluid model is used to solve self-consistently the first three moments of the Boltzmann’s equation coupled with the Poisson’s equation. The role of the presence of metastable atom density in the fluid model is clearly because of the domination of ionization processes by both stepwise and penning ionizations. Our results are validated with those obtained by both recent paper and experimental results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".