MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2342945819 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.160045

Analysis of Systemic Sclerosis-associated Genes in a Turkish Population

2016· article· en· W2342945819 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
F. David Carmona, Ahmet Mesut Onat, Tamara Fernández-Aranguren, Alberto Serrano-Fernández, Gema Robledo, Haner Di̇reskeneli̇, Amr H. Sawalha, Şule Yavuz, Javier Martı́n

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTurkishTurkish populationSystemic diseasePopulationGeneMultiple sclerosisInternal medicineGeneticsImmunopathologyImmunologyEnvironmental healthGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the genetic background of systemic sclerosis (SSc) in the Turkish population. METHODS: There were 354 cases and 718 unaffected controls from Turkey genotyped for the most relevant SSc genetic markers (IRF5-rs10488631, STAT4-rs3821236, CD247-rs2056626, DNASE1L3-rs35677470, IL12A-rs77583790, and ATG5-rs9373839). Association tests were conducted to identify possible associations. RESULTS: Except for ATG5, all the analyzed genes showed either significant associations (IRF5: p = 1.32E-05, OR 1.76; CD247: p = 2.20E-03, OR 0.75) or trends of association (STAT4: p = 0.066, OR 1.21; IL12A: p = 0.079, OR 4.07; DNASE1L3: p = 0.097, OR 1.41) with the overall disease or with specific phenotypes. CONCLUSION: The genetic component of SSc seems to be similar between Turks and Europeans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesFrench-language works237,207