MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343016312 · doi:10.22374/cjgim.v8i0.103

Managing the Patient Being Treated with Biologic Agents for Rheumatic Disease: Pearls for the General Internist

2013· article· en· W2343016312 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Alfred Cividino

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLeflunomideSulfasalazineHydroxychloroquineRheumatoid arthritisAnkylosing spondylitisMethotrexatePsoriatic arthritisAntirheumatic drugsDiseaseInfliximabAdalimumabTofacitinibInflammatory bowel diseaseAntirheumatic AgentsBiologic AgentsArthritisTumor necrosis factor alphaApremilastInternal medicineUlcerative colitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic polyarticular disease with systemic consequences leading to impairment and disability. Typical pharmacological treatment consists of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and disease-modifying drugs such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and leflunomide. When disease activity persists, the next level of treatment is the biologic drugs. Some of these agents have been available since 1999. Currently, there are nine biologic drugs available for the treatment of RA. Some agents such as the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors also have approved indications for psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and inflammatory bowel disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0070.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of General Internal MedicineSame topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesFrench-language works237,207