MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343025077

Chart Design Considerations for the Navigators of Today and Tomorrow

2015· article· en· W2343025077 on OpenAlexaff
Adam J. Kerr

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Hydrographic Review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Navigation and Safety
Canadian institutionsCanadian Hydrographic Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChartNautical chartTheme (computing)Operations researchEngineeringComputer scienceWorld Wide WebMathematicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It must be emphasized from the beginning that the ideas and comments in this paper are those of the writer and do not represent any official view. Although the paper may at first appear to discuss some widely separated issues, its main theme is to examine the communications between the nautical chart producer and the chart user. In addition, it will extend itself beyond its title to examine this same mechanism, with respect to the other nautical publications. The paper attempts to stimulate discussion. A potential danger for us all is that we become complacent, claiming that our methods or our products are the best. While self-confidence is desirable, complacency detracts from progress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Hydrographic ReviewSame topicMaritime Navigation and SafetyFrench-language works237,207