Beyond Sorry: Making the Apology Genuinely Meaningful in Australia?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acrylic on canvasShortly after my series on residential school abuse, entitled A Requiem for Our Children, which had a prolonged effect on me as most of that work was derived from interviews I did with former students, I painted this as a sort of conclusion, a closure for me of sorts.This painting is not so much against the teachings of Christ, but more about those who delivered his message, where the departure of goodness and holiness commences.There were people in charge of children where abuses under the guise of Christianity took place.It is one of the world's most tragic events, yet very little is documented in Canadian history.This painting is part of such documentation that needs to continue.-Jim Logan buryiNg the ruLer Carl beam (1943-2005) 1991 Photo emulsion and mixed media on handmade paperThe central image in this work is from a photograph that Carl, in the desert of Northern New Mexico, had taken shortly before the New Millennium.This image also appears in the Burying the Ruler Video.When asked about the meaning of the image, Carl had replied, "There are all kinds of Rulers in life ... some of them I have to bury on a daily basis." -Anne Beam -the hebroN reLoCatioN heather igloliorte 2002 Oil on canvasThe 1959 relocation of 60 Hebron families by church and government had devastating consequences for these people who were moved to more southern communities in Labrador.The reunion in 1999 began the healing process for many of these families and provided some closure to this painful part of Labrador Inuit history.Such forcible relocations are sadly recurrent, but as these paintings depict, they are not without hope of reconciliation.The artist is grateful for the permission of Hannie Hettasch for the use of her family's photo, Bob Mesher of Makivik Corporation, and the subjects in the photograph.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.032 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".