MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343154052 · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.03.336

P-06-011 Climacturia: An Under-addressed Sequela of Radical Prostatectomy, But Treatment is Only a Sling Away

2016· article· en· W2343154052 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Christine, Anthony J Bella

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSequelaProstatectomyMedicineUrologySling (weapon)SurgeryProstate cancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orgasm/sexual activity induced urinary incontinence (climacturia) is present in 20-48% of men who have undergone radical prostatectomy. We report the largest series to date of men with climacturia after radical prostatectomy treated with a transobturator male sling. Review of registry data for men treated with the AdVance male sling (Boston Scientific/AMS) following radical prostatectomy from 2010 through 2015 identified 37 men who had climacturia with stress urinary incontinence (sui) and 2 as stand alone climacturia. At this time, 37 had resumed sexual activity. All 37 (100%) report complete resolution of climacturia. Of the men with sui, 31 (83.7%) report resolution of sui. Climacturia is often present following radical prostatectomy, and can be effectively treated with a transobturator sling. Dr Christine: consultant Boston Scientific/AMS, and Coloplast, Corp Dr Bella: consultant Boston Scientific/AMS and Coloplast, Corp.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Sexual MedicineSame topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207