Reactive arthritis and other sequelae following sporadic Salmonella typhimurium infection in British Columbia, Canada: a case control study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe sequelae occurring in the 3 months after sporadic Salmonella typhimurium (ST) infection in British Columbia (BC), Canada. METHODS: We compared the incidence of sequelae to similar symptoms in controls; identified risk factors for developing sequelae; identified the incidence of reactive arthritis (ReA) as diagnosed by a rheumatologist, and assessed primary care physician diagnosis of ReA. A questionnaire was administered by telephone to cases of ST occurring in BC between December 1, 1999, and November 30, 2000; and to controls obtained from the BC provincial client registry. Cases reporting symptoms were followed up by a rheumatologist. RESULTS: Thirty-five of 66 (53%) cases reported any symptom, 17 (26%) reported joint symptoms. The Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (weighted by sex and pediatric/adult) of a salmonella case reporting "any symptom" compared to controls was 5.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.18-16.27; and reporting joint symptoms was 4.40; 95% CI: 1.25-19.53. The sex distribution of cases reporting joint symptoms was not significantly different. No medication taken during the salmonella infection was significantly different between the cases who had joint symptoms and those who did not. Four cases (2 adults, 2 children) were considered by the rheumatologist to have symptoms consistent with ReA, 2 of these had been told by a physician that their symptoms were related to their ST infection. CONCLUSION: Cases were more than 4 times more likely to report joint symptoms than controls; and despite the loss of many cases to followup, 6% of all cases were considered to have ReA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".