MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2343178942 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2016.2528223

A Novel Control Strategy for Online Harmonic Compensation in Parametrically Unbalanced Induction Motor

2016· article· en· W2343178942 on OpenAlexaff
Eshaan Ghosh, Aida Mollaeian, Weusong Hu, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonicsControl theory (sociology)Induction motorTorque rippleStatorInverterRotor (electric)Electromagnetic coilCompensation (psychology)Voltage compensationHarmonicWound rotor motorComputer scienceTorqueRippleDirect torque controlFault (geology)Harmonic analysisTransient (computer programming)VoltagePhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringControl (management)Acoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inverter-fed motor drive operating an unbalanced induction motor (IM) has high harmonic content which inflicts large torque ripple on the load. Dead short circuit and incipient or partial short circuit in motor stator windings lead to asymmetry in the machine parameters. Consequently, an imbalance in the voltage supply worsens the condition deteriorating the optimal performance of the drive-based motor due to the injection of both increased time and spatial harmonics. It is of primary importance that these discrepancies are taken care of while modeling a more fault tolerant, reduced harmonics drive system. This paper proposes a novel control strategy to minimize torque ripple by considering the time harmonics produced due to imbalance in inverter voltage and parameters of the faulty IM, and the estimated space harmonics from the measured magnetic flux density in a transient magnetic phenomenon. The proposed control strategy has been implemented on an unbalanced aluminum-rotor IM with online monitoring of unhealthy conditions and feeding it to the harmonic compensation block of the drive system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207